In the era of Generative AI, should artists somehow be rewarded for the use of their works in training Gen AI models?
Can a prompt be protected by copyright?
In a world in which prompts will become more and more relevant, the question arises: Do prompts qualify as "works" and therefore for copyright protection?
Should the Temporary Acts of Reproduction Exception Apply to AI systems?
After describing the training and content generation processes of current AI models, analogous to a mathematical function, we explore whether they should be able to benefit from the exemption of provisional technical reproductions.
Can Prompts constitute a relevant human contribution to protect AI-generated work?
In the classification of AI-generated works we can distinguish between (i) works generated autonomously by AI and (ii) works in which a relevant human contribution is verified, and copyright protection can be granted only to the latter. In this article we explore the possibility of achieving such a contribution through iterations of Prompts on what the AI generates.